What if the "Blue Jasmine" succeed in 2006?

The Russian-Chinese VETO and the move of the Russian and Chines navy ships as a military VETO, cannot be understood unless we know the danger of the US project on humanity.

In this appendix, what i will write is: If the US project succeed, what will happen? and what is the effect of the Zion defeat in Lebanon on the event followed that war?.. What will be written is  group of questions, and  i leave the reader to answer them, after we have a glimpse on the cold war.

The cold war...

It is not a secret that there is an unannounced cold war, and perhaps the race against time between the Russian Bulava missiles, and the US missile shield is part of this war, as what was untold about this war, the world did not see after the cold war between the socialist camp and the NATO..

For example, "Star Wars" did not exceed the attempt of pressing on the Soviet economy with a dummy Star War, while the Star War is present now, and it is real since Washington launched a military space aircraft that flew in space for several months, it was able hit any target in the world in half an hour, which called for China to drop a satellite in a strong message to the Star Wars waged by Washington.
As for Russia, not only did she develop the space defense reaching the dissemination of new space defense system, and beginning to arm the Russian army with S500 system, yet she announced the development of space aircrafts that no information about them were leaked till this day, as well as the entry of many new Russian aircrafts to the service (+4, ++4 & 5) at the expense of the fourth generation aircrafts, so Washington deploying the  missile shield is a message, and the Russian response in building giant across-continent missiles launched by submarines, was a counter-message.. and later, Washington deploying its ships near Spain  within the missile shield system is a message, and Russia's experiments on the "RS-12M Topol" missile  is a counter-message... these messages can be summed by the vessels that visited the Mediterranean announcing a Russian/Chinese military VETO to protect Syria, So why Syria is that important, that reached the collision of fleets and raising the China's military tone with information about expanding the Chinese navy abilities in the Indian ocean in an unprecedented way, which previously, when the situation tensed between the two Koreas, revealed  a "Nuclear city" that forced USA to be silent and content with invocation.

The fall of Syria and Lebanon..

What if the Blue Jasmine succeed in 2006? and Lebanon fall and Syria torn into small sectarian countries?.. When searching for answers for this question through the events that followed the invasion on Lebanon, we can understand the secrets of the Russian and Chinese VETO, which did not sustain its political form in the UNSC, yet became a military one signed by the Russian barges in the Mediterranean and the Chinese ones in the Indian ocean... So i will discuss only the year 2006, as the events that followed it until 2011 are all clear, and so the reader would know what will will follow the invasion on Syria, and i will leave the reader to understand the great game on his own during the period between 2006 and 2011 what are the events that the Zion defeat effected on during this period.

The assumption:  In light of the sectarian tension as a result of terrorist acts done by the US occupation in Iraq, and in light of the hostility toward Islam in the west these days, the question is: what if Washington succeed in eliminating the resistance and inflame Beirut sectarian like, and implement the scenario that took place in 2011 in Syria after the war is over, and dividing Syria into fighting sectarian small countries , and the sectarian talk is the ruler in the region, which will include the Gulf and specially Bahrain and Qtef??

Here we begin narrating the events that followed the invasion on Lebanon, leaving the reader to search for repercussions of Lebanon war upon it, and when finish, take a look at the world's map and read the results if the all Washington's project succeeded, to take note, after July war and departing the southern people and eliminating the resistance, the scenario in Syria was supposed to start, and less than two years, Syria would be 6 small countries and Iraq 3 countries in 2008, i.e after inflaming a sectarian conflict in Syria at least for two years, which is the required period to extract gas from the Mediterranean and end the demographic change in Syria.

Sudan:

Dis Hizbullah's victory push China to raise the ceiling of confrontation with Washington, and supporting Sudan to host Chad rebels and move the conflict from Darfur into inside Chad near the capitol, until there was a compromise in 2010 that made the world forget that the Sudan president is wanted for the ICC, and Darfur region was calmed, knowing that Darfur region reached the peak of the fire back in 2008, but is the calmness of Darfur region and preventing the transfer of the south oil outside the north lands contributed in protecting Sudan from a new civil war?

The gas to Europe:

In the same year of the Hariri Assassination in Lebanon, there was the Orange revolution in Ukraine, and the colored revolution and the gas crisis occurred in 2008 and 2009, passing through the war of gas when the Russian gas was blocked from Europe for two weeks, if there was an alternative to this gas from the East Med and North Iraq gas, i.e two years after the war on Lebanon, could Moscow lose its influence in Central  Asia and the Russian economy retreat, which depends on the export of crude, yet it become on the verge of collapse and ignite Chechnya? Did the victory in Lebanon and Washington inability to control the Mediterranean gas , saved Russia and overthrown the Orange revolution later? as Israel defeat and the failure of the gas excavation projects in 2006 and 2008 was a reason to overthrow the Orange, and if the loss of the war in Lebanon led to start pumping gas in "Nord stream" , the defeat in Syria could mean later the start of installation and pumping gas in the "Southern stream", and the loss of Ukraine's mainstay of its economy, which is the trade of the Russian gas, will be forced to return later to the fold of Russia, to harvest what the Orange planted over several years.

Georgia and Central Asia..

While Washington was unable provide gas to Europe through the Nabucco pipeline after the defeat in Lebanon, and the defeat of the US, was it the reason for the separation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and the entry of the Russian army to a place near Tbilisi during the Balkan war in 2008 and destroying the entire infrastructure of the Nabucco pipeline? Was the Balkan war a reason for signing contracts and strategic agreements between Russia and Azerbaijan, and between Iran and Turkmenistan and suppress the US influence in Central Asia?

Belarus:

Is the Israeli failure in Lebanon and not providing an alternative to the Russian gas, have pushed Germany to suppress the US intervention in Belarus to protects its imports of the Russian gas? and prevent the colored uprisings from reaching Belarus, and the Americans stop mentioning "Lukashenko" in every statement?, today, the Nord Stream is under construction, and Belarus is out of the US ambitions to control the energy crossings.

 China:

Did Hizbulla's victory strengthen the Chinese position? and thus US agents were unable ignite Chine in "Qing Yang" region in 2009, when Erdogan emerged as a defender of Muslims.. and did the victory of the resistance made the position of the resisting Islam in China a strong one in the face of extreme Takfiri Islam? and the Ethnic conflict in China did not develop.. What could have happened if those protests proke out accompanied with blocking the Chinese oil from Iran and Sudan and on the impact of the sectarian fires in the Middle East?

Russia one more time:

Did the victory in Lebanon participate in strengthening the resisting Islam in Russia? and enhanced the position of the Russian Islamic scholars? which made Moscow arrest hundreds of mercenaries, specially Arab and Afghan Arab who were waiting for the "Zoro" hour, and some of them are still present in Chechnya and Daghestan forests.. was the Russian Islam approach to support the real resistance in Palestine and not the blind terrorism that serves USA, a result for this victory? we leave it to the reader to look for it.

Alger:

Did the US defeat push Moscow to move the conflict from Alger to Tunis, Libya, Egypt and Italy? and made Washington instead of interfering in Alger issues, fight to preserve its existence in some countries like Tunis, Libya and Egypt?

Even Kyrgyzstan:

Has burning the US in Iraq and Afghanistan and the failure in Lebanon, reflected on its allies? and was it a reason in the overthrow of the Iris revolution in Kyrgyzstan in 2005? and Washington now paying 2 Billion Dollars for its base in Kyrgyzstan, and its influence in Central Asia dropped for the benefit of the Russian influence. Did Hizbulla victory strengthen the Russian position to overthrow Washington allies in Kyrgyzstan after the fear of the gas alternative to Russia's had gone?

Syria:

If not for the victory of Hizbulla, Would Washington have to postpone the project to hit Syria five years in advance? and allow it during this period to burn the US in Iraq along with its sectarian ordeal? and be alble to fight the US project in 2011 being this strong, and totally unraveling it with minimal losses? and by pass the sectarian tension planted by Washington in Iraq and the region.. Here i am confident that Syria faced the aggression strong, civilized and coherent, and we must not deny that president Bashar Al Assad obtained his popularity after the reform campaign between 2003 and 2006, as during this period, the most important causes of waste were stopped, and Syria paid most of its debt.. but the victory of the resistance remains the most important reason for the growing popularity of president Bashar Al Assad, not just in Syria, but in the Arab world as well.

Unfortunately, we cannot talk about the US project with a number of lines, and we cannot explain the dimensions of the grand US defeat between 2006 and 2011, and i leave the reader to imagine these dimensions, and imagine the losses that US had to pay after the defeat in Lebanon.
I am no exaggerating if i said that the implications of the defeat in Lebanon were global, but it is the truth if we look closely, and here i leave the reader to predict what will happen to the US after its defeat in Syria, and the US since end May was defeated in Syria and still insist on being stubborn, because the US knows that this defeat is the first Domino stone for the US defeats, as there is no hope for the US in Shiite small countries in the Island , therefore, what the US planted, the US will harvest, also in Yemen and maybe in Egypt, even in Turkey, as what awaits the US after the defeat in Syria is a series of defeats  similar to those followed the defeat in Lebanon, and we leave the days to uncover what was hidden.

It is enough to revue the map with the names of already mentioned countries, to know that Washington project was to occupy the world, as Washington cannot subject Chine without controlling Iran and Sudan, and Russia cannot be toppled without hitting its economy by hitting its gas exports, For this reason USA have to occupy Lebanon and destroy Syria, and she cannot control the rest of the geopolitical passages without controlling Belarus, Alger, Syria, Ukraine and Afghanistan, so the entire world would become subordinate to its control.
The US decided to occupy the world, and the world rebelled, and there was a multi-polar world, starting from Russia, China, India, Brazil, South Africa and the resistance axis (Syria and Iran), the ALBA in Latin America.. the world continue to change, and the US empire continue to deteriorate.. and some Arab countries remain insistent to drown with the US, and watch the world change.. and they do not change with it.

Conclusion:

Perhaps some would say that we are exaggerating, and some said that other people beat me to it and said some of what i have written, but the question remains, Could Chine use the VETO if lost its oil resources from Iran and Sudan? and could Russia use the VETO if lost the European market, and if the selling of gas needs a US approval, and its economy deteriorated from within?

Perhaps they say this is exaggeration, but let us presume that Syria had fallen, and the export of gas to Europe from Egypt, Middle Asia and Northern Iraq began, and the Gulf raised its oil imports.. would the Russian economy deteriorate then? what is the volume of oil and gas export compared to the Russian budget? would Russia be able defend Alger and Belarus and others?, Would China dare raise the ceiling of confrontation with the US and defend Ian and Sudan? i leave the reader to imagine the dangers of the US project which will make the world's people as slaves to USA, after it becomes a one pole.

Yes, after invading Afghanistan and Iraq, US allies won from southern Sudan to Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine, reaching to Lebanon and what was called the Cedar revolution, and Washington started the march to occupy the world, and when USA lost in Lebanon, its leaves started to fall all around the world, not just from Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan and Darfur region, Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon, yet it started started losing in Tunis, Egypt and Libya.. and i am confident that the result of the US loss in Syria will be disastrous to US allies, this is why Washington today fighting to the last breath, to the point that the US state department asked the armed men not to surrender and turn their weapons to the authorities.

The End..

Original Arabic article by Kefah Nssr - Jouhaina News. 

Taliban in Doha, will Moscow be silent, and what are the implications on Damascus..??

Perhaps history do not repeat itself, and those who do not learn from history are repeated, and opening an office for Taliban in Qatar, is an indicator for a US escalation in the face of Russia, China, Pakistan and even Iran... But where is this escalation going..? and is Doha away from the implications of this escalation?
Until this day, until this day, only one Russian statement was out that denounced this unilateral step, but on the ground there are features of joint responses, that might lead later to make the US escalation, a true US drowning.

Taliban and Washington: Bill Clinton boycott Taliban and refused to recognize them, Bush senior welcomed them in USA, and Bush junior waged his war of Taliban and Afghanistan, and we can only describe Taliban as a wife raped by her husband (the Qaradawi way) anytime he wants, and make peace with her any time her wants.. and after about ten years of war on Afghanistan, Washington is back to the beginning, and with Washington's defeat in Iraq and realizing that the next defeat in Afghanistan is near, Washington went far in negotiating with Taliban solely, forgetting that there are countries affecting and previously affected with all what happened in Afghanistan, and will not stand there waiting to harvest the results of any US deal with Taliban.

Taliban office in Doha: perhaps the fastest implications of opening an office for Taliban in Qatar, was on Pakistan, which is primarily concerned with what's happening in Afghanistan in a direct way, and her tense relations with Washington which reached the point of emptying some of US bases there, even part of the Iranian escalation is a result for this unilateral step by the Americans.
In Kyrgyzstan, where the Iris revolution fell, and the US base rent cost Washington two Billion Dollars per year, the Kyrgyzstani president said that the US base is a danger to Kyrgyzstan, while the Afghani government welcomed the step, but cautiously, and stressed that the talks must be lead by Afghanis, which reflects the Afghan government concern of what happened, as for Haqqani network, it did not comment till this day on what happened, in return, China in a statement issued on 05/01/2012 was somewhat closer to the Afghan government position, as China wants reach a comprehensive peace, "Hong Lee" Chinese foreign ministry spokesman called to fully respect the Afghani government and people's choice, As for Russia who previously warned from any unilateral talks two months ago, her representative to the UNSC assured the importance of withdrawing all S forces from Afghanistan, also "Rogozin" reiterated at the end of last year, saying "When they negotiate behind closed doors, the future of Afghanistan, then they inform us that they are willing to withdraw from there at the end of 2014 permanently, we would like to tell them that we do not believe them", and according to him, Russia wants to participate in the talks about Afghanistan naturally, also Russia's envoy to Afghanistan  "Zamir Kabulov" said that the US will to create military basis in Afghanistan, after the withdraw of the international forces, raises great concerns to Russia.

 The implications of any unilateral US steps: Perhaps the tension of the US-Pakistani relations is not a serious indicator, but what is important is the growing strength of India's military power, at the expense of Washington seriously undermining Pakistan, as India is Russia's darling ally, same as Pakistan is a friend of China, and if the US project overcame many of the Chinese-Indian differences, any unilateral US move will have wide rebounds, and perhaps Asia get united against the US project, and it is expected in case Washington isolate Afghanistan neighbors from any talks with Taliban, Moscow will seek to overcome most of the differences between the region's countries, and as Russia and China previously solved their problems, and a "Good Neighbors" agreement was signed between them, also overcoming the Chinese-Indian differences in BRIC group, perhaps it will expand to place a schedule for agreement and overcoming the present differences in Asia, and if the US strike on Syria have created a resistant axis against Washington's policy, and strengthen the relations between some countries, any incalculated move for US in Afghanistan, was not a pressure point, and will never be a bargaining one, but it will strengthen and expand the anti-Washington policy alliance, and will enhance the Russian-Iranian, Chines-Iranian, Pakistani-Iranian and Indian-Iranian convergence, plus the Asian cooperation in general, and the aim will be burning Washington in Afghanistan, and perhaps will help in overcoming the differences between India and Pakistan.

Yes, Washington could solely negotiate with Taliban, but it cannot arrange its withdrawal and guarantee Afghanistan future without Afghanistan neighbors, specially that Iran refuses to enter any single bilateral negotiations with Washington, therefore, Taliban office in Doha do not cause any worrying, yet it will let us say to Washington (once again) thank you for creating an axis that puts an end to Washington reckless policies, and as the Kazakhstan analyst "Adel Mokashev" said: Washington (without knowing) pushed for the creation of a Chinese-Russian-Iranian alliance, and now she is about to create an Asian alliance.. unknowingly.

The Taliban office implications of the Syrian file: Ofcourse, Washington did not hesitate in using Afghan mercenaries in the terrorist actions in Syria, and parts of the armed groups were Afghans, and Taliban office in Doha will not change anything, and will not have any implications or anything new on the Syrian file, but does Washington think that the Syrian field will be compared to the Afghanistan one? Washington fully realize that the steps she made did not satisfy even the Afghan government even if it had supported it, and will be concluded to the burning of Washington in Afghanistan, similar to what happened in Iraq, and equating the Syrian field with the Afghan one will not be accepted, yet the conflict fields will be expanded and might include the US forces in the Gulf area, specially that great part of Taliban movement completely refuse negotiation with USA, specially that the Afghan resistance is not confined to Taliban, and Iran will not indulge in individual negotiations with USA, specially that now Iran is enjoying strategic agreements with Moscow due to the attack on Syria and the region's developments, as Iran is a powerful player in the Afghan field, so we can say that the US forces will not dream in keeping an bases after 2014, but there will be a reaction that might speed up the US withdrawal before 2014, and the implications of the singular US talks will be reflected on Washington allies and not on the Syrian file, and in case the terrorist acts continued in Damascus, there will be no field away from what is happening in Damascus, and the Syrian field cannot be met with the Afghan one, but the conflict will expand and Damascus will find herself among a wide alliance, that it benefits engage with hers.

The End..

Original Arabic article by Kifah Nssr - Juhaina News.

The Plan - The Play to the Overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad

Nader Ezzeddine (Al Manar TV) - Tense and winding labor waged by the Arab and Qatari diplomacy with the leadership in the Syrian Arab republic to sign the protocol that say of sending a delegation of observers to closely monitor the events in Syria.... After the agreement, The vanguard of the Arab's mission were welcomed by explosions that rocked the security headquarters in Damascus, but this security message did not prevent the mission from exercising  their job, to begin its mission in the Syrian cities without any obstacles by the regime, and before raising its first formal report, it was attacked by the "diplomacy" of what is known as the "National Council" so the blackmail scene is proceeded with confessional statements of the bombing of the security situation by the person who identified himself as colonel "Ryad Al Asa'ad", opening the scene in front of USA and France who were calling for the intervention of the security council, so that those two countries prove one more time that they administrate this game from A to Z, and that the Arab observers mission is only a tool in the hand of Washington, that she use to achieve her "dirty" projects in the region... so Al Asa'ad's announcement that came from his safe house in southern Turkey about a "surprise for the Syrian regime and the entire world", and with his usual audacity, he showed resentment at the observer's statements, rejecting their assertions on the cooperation of the Syrian authorities.

So what is the "surprise plan" that Ryad Al Asa'ad is talking about?

The ministerial committee mourns the observers mission.

Sources related to the security departments in the decision making countries, reveal to "Al Manar TV" the plan prepared by USA and which entered into force along with the obituary of the Arab observers mission's work in Syria by both Washington and Paris.
These sources say that the decided meeting of the ministerial committee concerned in the Syrian issue on Sunday 08/01/2012 will mourn (even if not officially) the Arab observers mission, and this will be the first step i the new plan to overthrow president Bashar Al Assad.
The sources add "Basically, there was no need for this mission, can't the satellites film the massacres that they pretend happening?? then why they need the mission to be on the Syrian soils? this was only decoration to prepare the scene which its scenario is already written and the director is American, and the actors are regional and international, and who wrote the scenario also wrote the end of the play.. but he need some scenes so that the work can be complete... and what's happening today is only part of the scene"..

The diversion mission to let in Al Qaida organization and the Takfiris to Syria..

But what is the real role of this mission? and why it was mourned this fast?

The sources answer that the mission's work is done, as who sent it knows exactly that it cannot condemn the Syrian regime when it truly sees what's happening in Syria, which is clear by the mission's chief's statements, but what was required is to distract the Syrian regime to complete the field preparations for the new plan, so Al Qaida-Takfiri people were smuggled through the Lebanese, Iraqi and Turkish boarders with Syria, among them 600 Arab fighters already used by the NATO in Libya.
During the mission's work, Takfiri groups entered in preparation for the phase of turning the opposition into a n armed coup that carries sounding slogans, all that for the benefit of the project that aim to destroy Syria.. as executing the US agenda comes as a strategic compensation for her withdrawal from Iraq and soon from Afghanistan.

Taliban office in Qatar, and the Qatari gas platform in Israel..

But, Where did these Takfiri groups came from? and who provide her with the movement sideline?

To answer this question, according to our sources, it is enough to turn to the role played by Qatar in bringing close that Takfiri Taliban movement and USA, and opening an office for this movement in Doha, which was preparation for using Taliban members against Syria now and against Iran in Baluchistan in the coming phase to tense the sectarian situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in an indication to moving the Qatari intervention from the diplomatic and media level to using the Takfiris file, in an attempt to exit the failure tunnel which Qatar placed herself in due to Burha Ghaliun's failure in bringing in the inner and outer opposition.
Here we ask the question, will Taliban and some Islamic movements be the price that Qatar pay to USA instead of Israel buying Millions of tons of Qatari liquidized gas, which Israeli is preparing for it a platform in Haifa? and will Taliban members and some of the Islamic movements will achieve the US-Israeli aims in the region in fragmenting the axis of resistance and opposition?

It is not unlikely or surprising, as returning to the study by retired brigadier general, Dr. Muhammad Abbas, entitled "The fate of the US military presence in Iraq in the light of the regional and international changes", we find that the planned US strategy to face the region's developments, include raising unrest and division in the countries that object the US project in the region, and the first target in this project is Syria, in revival of a former plan for the neo-conservatives to overthrow the Syrian regime, due to Syria's important position and the national role played by her in the issue of Arab-Israeli conflict, and her not submission to the US dictations... overthrowing Syria weaken the resistance movements in Lebanon and Palestine, and besiege Iran and leave her without support or allies and makes her influence in Palestine case nonexistent"..
Brigadier Abbas add in his study "In my opinion, all the interventions over Syria and the unrest in her cities, implied by the US  which was proved to present (in coordination with Turkey and Arab countries) logistic, financial and political support for the Syrian opposition".. Brigadier Abbas stress that "the shared interest and  pragmatic mind of the US do not hesitate to hold understandings and deals (...) also Wikileaks documents revealed communications between some of the MBs leaders (specially Tunis MBs) and the Syrian ones.

Ban Ki Moon's visit and placing hot topics..

After confirming the failure of the Arab initiative, the UN secretary general arrives Beirut on 13/01/2012 in a 3 days visit, which he meets during the visit with president Michel Suleiman and PM Najib Mikati, and not meet with Nabih Berri the parliament chairman, in a step that hold many implications... Sources say that Ban Ki Moon will rise the issue of the Syrian violations, and abducting Syrian opposition members and arm smuggling, and the repeated attacks on the UNFIL and launching missiles toward Israel, plus the call to implement the decision No. 1701".. the UN official will also discus decision No.1680 (which calls to drawing the boarders with Syria as an important step toward insuring the sovereignty of Lebanon and the safety of its lands and its political Independence) and decision No.1559 about the Palestinian weaponry  and Hisbullah's weapons and their effect on the stability of Lebanon and the region.. Ban Ki Moon will direct an opening speech on 15/01/2012 in an international conference titled "reform and moving toward democracy" organized by the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) of the United Nations.

Our sources reveal that Ban Ki Moon's visit will be accompanied by the visit of a number of US officials to the region, and specially to Lebanon to study the possibilities of intensifying the sanctions in Syria from Lebanon and press more on Hizbullah.

The plan to besiege Hizbullah and the communication between Lebanon and Syria..

The process of besieging Hizbullah will begin directly after this visit, as the UN official who will also bring about (according to our sources) the case of the "Syrian refugees in Lebanon" will give the green light for the UN and international organizations to work on supporting those "refugees" as a background to support the Syrian armed revolution and present it with help to achieve its goals.
Thus begins the embarrassment of Hizbullah that is threatened with the deterioration of the security-ordeal situation and overthrowing the government is refuse to facilitate the work of the international organizations northern Lebanon.. Not to mention the information revealed by our sources about "targeting" UNIFIL forces  southern Lebanon that might be done by Takfiri groups to internationally embarrass Hizbullah, and accusing it with this targeting, therefore, limit its role and reduce the possibility of its influence on the decisions of Lebanon, to open the door in front of moving north Lebanon and Bikaa fronts to be the waste that support the middle triangle in Homs (We will describe the meaning of the "middle triangle" within the article context) and will open the communication channel toward the Syrian coast and Damascus countryside.
Within the plan, the civil and trade communication between Lebanon and Syria will be cut, on the background of fabricated security incidents on more than one boarder crossings, which will make the trade shipping process between the two countries prone to actions could be done by Takfiri groups which also suppose to execute terrorist acts that target the transportation sector inside Syria, so this will be another form for executing sanctions against the Syrian regime to force it to surrender permanently.

Therefore, announcing the failure of the Arab initiative and officially mourning it, will be accompanied by referring the Syrian file to the UN as requested by USA, and the joint movement will be the visit of Ban Ki Moon to Lebanon which will be before the announcement at the end of January of a new US and European list of sanctions against Syria and Iran which will include more than 160 financial and banking institutes and the oil sectors and the transportation sector plus personnel.

Forming the security triangles inside Syria, and the strategy of occupying the public squares..

The sources reveal a NATO plan that imply forming security triangles all over the Syrian geography, and will be in this way:


In the first step:
- A northern triangle: that include Jisr Al Shughur, Maaret Al Numan and Idleb.
- A middle triangle: that include Homs, Tal Kalakh and Hama.
- A southern triangle: that include Daraa, Jasem and Sanamen.
- Damascus countryside triangle: that include Douma, Zabadan and Muadmieh.


In the second step:
- The Kurds triangle (Hasaka and Qamishly)
- The clan triangle (Der Azzour)

The aim of forming the first four triangles is besieging the political capitol Damascus and the industrial capitol Aleppo completely, as arming the "revolution" will be publicly announced as a result of the failure of the Arab observer's mission, then the political powers of the Takfiri groups will occupy the main squares in the first four triangles, and intensify the mobile demonstrations, and what is called the "Free Syrian Army" will protect the squares occupiers which will lead to double the pressure of the sanctions on the Syrian street.

This will be accompanied with the attempt to cut the trade lines that connect Damascus with Aleppo in the coming phase through the "Middle Triangle", as Takfiri groups will execute terrorist operations along the fast ways that connect the capitol with the main cities on the sides, which will lead to the reduction of the trade and will effect the Syrian economy from within... as for the last two triangles, the armed men will perform military operation that will target the security points and boarder ones to frighten the security forces and the boarders guards, and create secure places to facilitate the coming and going of Takfiris.

In conclusion, everything starts with the announcement of the failure of the trembling of the Arabs mission, followed by the visit of Ban Ki Moon to Lebanon and Jordan, and continued with the plan to embarrass Hizbullah in preparation to use north Lebanon and east Lebanon for the logistic support against the Syrian Arab republic, all that will be accompanied by new foreign sanctions and a internal security siege and the announcement of the increase in defections  in the coming days, and the diplomatic activities and pressures will increase which will be done by USA on the international level, to obtain a breach in the Russian and Chinese fronts.. as for the regional level, we will witness re-activation of the Turkish-Qatari-Egyptian-Saudi roles, and re-stirring the sectarian unrest on the Lebanese and Iraqi levels.

This is the surprise that Ryad Al Asa'a talked about, will it be the same after revealing it? or USA will add a new scene to the chapters of her play in preparation to make the necessary adjustments?

The End..

Original Arabic article by Nader Ezzeddine - Al Manar TV.
nader.ezzddine@hotmail.com